Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:42:35 02/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
>You are not going to compare 11 games in Paris with 200 by SSDF, are >you. I compare any data I have. And all my data says: it is not stronger. And all my data fits to the paris data. >I do. Anybody that tested Fritz 5 without prejudices does. Prejudices ? We are talking about programs ! They play games, or they don't play games. They win or lose. >It is that >strong. Nimzo is strong too. Nimzo is a different thing. I had no problems in reproducing ANY good results with Nimzo ! I have told Chrilly and his friends about and I posted my Nimzo results here the day I first time got them (arround christmas time). But Fritz5 ? I have this program for a long time. > And Moritz was right all along. Sorry. I don't believe in these results. Substract the machine-improvement. Substract the learning stuff. And still the "progress" is too big. And IF there would have been a progress, we would have measured it months before. And we didn't. No - we can be different opinion Enrique. I doubt these results. There is something wrong in the swedish data. I don't know what it is. But the more crazy data they produce, the more it gets obvious. What about doubled games ? How do they handle those duplicated games ?? >I admit I >didn't expect so much improvement from Fritz 5. But I knew it was as >strong as Hiarcs 6, Rebel 9 or Nimzo98. Sorry - but Fritz5 is not as strong as Hiarcs6 or Rebel9 or Nimzo98. > >Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.