Author: Hermano Ecuadoriano
Date: 12:37:40 01/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2001 at 14:25:39, Richard Heldmann wrote: >ERT.04 >Pentium 200MMX 64mb RAM Windows 98 >Crafty 18.1 8mb hash >Chess Tiger 8mb hash > > 12345678901234567890 >1 Chess Tiger 13.0 1½1011½111½11½01½½½1 14.5/20 >2 Crafty v18.1 0½0100½000½00½10½½½0 5.5/20 > >PGN available on request. Thanks. My testing shows Tiger13 better than Gambit Tiger against Crafty. My testing also shows that their scores against Crafty improve with slower time controls, and your data here support that. I have Tiger13 +13 -6 =14 against Crafty 18.1 on a PII-300 at 5 3, and other results. I think that with larger sample sizes, it could be proven that the Tigers are relatively better against Crafty with slower time controls, or equivalently, on faster hardware. Christophe Theron "himself" doesn't believe this has ever been proven. Here's one quick experiment: On your 200Mhz machine, at a time control of 5 3 or faster, Gambit Tiger might lose to Crafty. It scored +12 -12 =7 on mine.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.