Author: Pete Galati
Date: 15:14:24 01/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2001 at 17:08:19, Pete Galati wrote: >On January 24, 2001 at 15:52:06, Paul wrote: > >>On January 24, 2001 at 14:44:53, Pete Galati wrote: >> [......] >>Right ... on my system, under the Fritz6 interface, and with TB's out of >>it's sight, Comet says Bc2+ and mate in 4. So it must be the TB hits. >> >>Paul > >I suppose I should redo these but not tell Comet where the tablebases are, your >set of EPDs are the first ones I've done that with, I gotta go > >set tb_path=c:\tablebse > >first, and then Comet knows where they are, and it chews up some mem for >decompressing them and for the cache. > >Dann just posted a bunch of CAP results, I should try it with and without the >TBs and see if Comet gets beat up without them. > >Pete Hmmmm, I just ran the first 11 positions of Dann's, without tablebases, and only 2 minutes per position Comet V B.28 Stil: selective search Hash-Tab:58514K Datei: cap2 Wed Jan 24 16:47:45 2001 01: score: +M8 Nodes/Sec: 345669 [11] a5a6 in 1:00 [11] 02: score: +M6 Nodes/Sec: 270251 [08] a6a7 in 0:02 [8] 03: score: +M4 Nodes/Sec: 272034 [06] a7a8/D in 0:00 [4] 04: score: +M9 Nodes/Sec: 382204 [04] b8b1 in 0:00 [3] 05: score: +M4 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [03] c8c7 in 0:00 [2] 06: score: +M11 Nodes/Sec: 282701 [12] g5g6 in 1:37 [12] 07: score: +M13 Nodes/Sec: 300631 [13] g6g7 in 0:02 [9] 08: score: +M1 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [01] d8g8 in 0:00 [1] 09: score: +9.81 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [02] h6h7 in 0:00 [1] 10: score: +M2 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [02] h7h8 in 0:00 [1] 11: score: +M1 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [01] h7h8 in 0:00 [1] And there's a few mate in high numbers positions. I suppose that's related to the fast search time, maybe, but most of Comet's moves aggree with the CAP moves which I think were all searching for a lot longer and in stronger programs (that's the theory I think). 1K2k3/8/8/P4pp1/3R1Pp1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm a6; id "01"; 1K2k3/8/P7/5pp1/3R1P2/6p1/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm a7; id "02"; 1K2k3/P7/8/5p2/3R1p2/6p1/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm a8=Q; id "03"; 1r4k1/p2Q2p1/8/3Pq3/2P1p1B1/P6P/6P1/6K1 b - - 0 1 bm Rb1+; id "04"; 2Q5/4kp1p/4p3/3pP1PN/8/1p1q4/1P3KP1/8 w - - 0 1 bm Qc7+; id "05"; 2bnN1k1/6P1/4p3/1P2N1P1/3K4/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm g6; id "06"; 2bnNk2/8/4p1P1/1P2N1P1/3K4/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm g7+; id "07"; 3Q4/5pkp/4pN2/3pP1P1/8/1p1q4/1P3KP1/8 w - - 0 1 bm Qg8#; id "08"; 3b1q1k/r4r1p/7R/pppPpQp1/4P1N1/1PP3P1/1P3PK1/7R w - - 0 1 bm Rxh7+; id "09"; 3b1qk1/r4r1R/8/pppPpQp1/4P1N1/1PP3P1/1P3PK1/7R w - - 0 1 bm Rh8+; id "10"; 3b1qk1/r5rR/6Q1/pppPp1p1/4P1N1/1PP3P1/1P3PK1/7R w - - 0 1 bm Rh8#; id "11"; I put the CAP move in as the best move, and Comet choked on the CAP ID #'s, so I had to change those. Pete
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.