Author: Paul
Date: 18:25:23 01/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2001 at 18:14:24, Pete Galati wrote: >Hmmmm, I just ran the first 11 positions of Dann's, without tablebases, and only >2 minutes per position > >Comet V B.28 Stil: selective search Hash-Tab:58514K > Datei: cap2 Wed Jan 24 16:47:45 2001 > >01: score: +M8 Nodes/Sec: 345669 [11] a5a6 in 1:00 [11] >02: score: +M6 Nodes/Sec: 270251 [08] a6a7 in 0:02 [8] >03: score: +M4 Nodes/Sec: 272034 [06] a7a8/D in 0:00 [4] >04: score: +M9 Nodes/Sec: 382204 [04] b8b1 in 0:00 [3] >05: score: +M4 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [03] c8c7 in 0:00 [2] >06: score: +M11 Nodes/Sec: 282701 [12] g5g6 in 1:37 [12] >07: score: +M13 Nodes/Sec: 300631 [13] g6g7 in 0:02 [9] >08: score: +M1 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [01] d8g8 in 0:00 [1] >09: score: +9.81 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [02] h6h7 in 0:00 [1] >10: score: +M2 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [02] h7h8 in 0:00 [1] >11: score: +M1 Nodes/Sec: 16384 [01] h7h8 in 0:00 [1] > >And there's a few mate in high numbers positions. I suppose that's related to >the fast search time, maybe, but most of Comet's moves aggree with the CAP moves >which I think were all searching for a lot longer and in stronger programs >(that's the theory I think). > >1K2k3/8/8/P4pp1/3R1Pp1/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm a6; id "01"; >1K2k3/8/P7/5pp1/3R1P2/6p1/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm a7; id "02"; >1K2k3/P7/8/5p2/3R1p2/6p1/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm a8=Q; id "03"; >1r4k1/p2Q2p1/8/3Pq3/2P1p1B1/P6P/6P1/6K1 b - - 0 1 bm Rb1+; id "04"; >2Q5/4kp1p/4p3/3pP1PN/8/1p1q4/1P3KP1/8 w - - 0 1 bm Qc7+; id "05"; >2bnN1k1/6P1/4p3/1P2N1P1/3K4/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm g6; id "06"; >2bnNk2/8/4p1P1/1P2N1P1/3K4/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 bm g7+; id "07"; >3Q4/5pkp/4pN2/3pP1P1/8/1p1q4/1P3KP1/8 w - - 0 1 bm Qg8#; id "08"; >3b1q1k/r4r1p/7R/pppPpQp1/4P1N1/1PP3P1/1P3PK1/7R w - - 0 1 bm Rxh7+; id "09"; >3b1qk1/r4r1R/8/pppPpQp1/4P1N1/1PP3P1/1P3PK1/7R w - - 0 1 bm Rh8+; id "10"; >3b1qk1/r5rR/6Q1/pppPp1p1/4P1N1/1PP3P1/1P3PK1/7R w - - 0 1 bm Rh8#; id "11"; > >I put the CAP move in as the best move, and Comet choked on the CAP ID #'s, so I >had to change those. > >Pete Well, I wanted to go thru those also, but instead made the wrong choice of starting Pretz on that Mate in 16 problem in the other thread ... upto ply 15 it went pretty swift (18'), but there's something massive happening on ply 16 (not surprising). It's been thinking for 2h30m, hasn't finished, and now I have to shut it down coz my comp is standing next to my bed, and it's getting early overhere in Amsterdam. Yuck!! Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.