Author: Aloisio Ponti Lopes
Date: 06:10:15 01/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2001 at 16:26:23, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>Here's one quick experiment: On your 200Mhz machine, at a time control of >>5 3 or faster, Gambit Tiger might lose to Crafty. It scored +12 -12 =7 on >>mine. > > >I can tell you absolutely that your data is flawed. Crafty is _absolutely_ >weaker at blitz than it is at longer time controls. And this is based on >_thousands_ of test games, not on a few dozen. The things I do in my search >rely on fast hardware, or else long time controls. The faster the game, the >worse Crafty will do as its simple q-search will get it into trouble faster >since null-move failures happen more often at reduced depth... Maybe against 16.19 the results would have been diferent ? A. Ponti
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.