Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:43:51 01/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2001 at 09:10:15, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >On January 24, 2001 at 16:26:23, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>>Here's one quick experiment: On your 200Mhz machine, at a time control of >>>5 3 or faster, Gambit Tiger might lose to Crafty. It scored +12 -12 =7 on >>>mine. >> >> >>I can tell you absolutely that your data is flawed. Crafty is _absolutely_ >>weaker at blitz than it is at longer time controls. And this is based on >>_thousands_ of test games, not on a few dozen. The things I do in my search >>rely on fast hardware, or else long time controls. The faster the game, the >>worse Crafty will do as its simple q-search will get it into trouble faster >>since null-move failures happen more often at reduced depth... > >Maybe against 16.19 the results would have been diferent ? > >A. Ponti I don't believe so. It would be possible to play a 1000 game match, but I am not sure X vs X matches show a lot unless X is very close to Y except for 1 change... it gives an idea about the single change. 16.19 has the _same_ search as 18.1, and suffers from the same null-move problem...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.