Author: leonid
Date: 17:32:44 01/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2001 at 09:06:27, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 26, 2001 at 07:08:14, leonid wrote: > >>On January 26, 2001 at 06:55:42, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote: >> >>> Hi Leonid!,I like miniatures better,so here are two of them[twins]: >>> Werner Speckmann,1955 Mate in 17 >>> [D]8/p7/8/2p5/p3Q3/K7/2r5/1k6 w >>> Werner Speckmann,1955 Mate in 13 >>> [D]8/8/4p3/2p5/p3Q3/K7/2r5/1k6 w >> >>Thanks! And what is was, some creation of problems or some positions that >>resulted from real chess championship? >> >>Leonid. > >If you are interested in positions from human-human games there is no problem to >find them. > >Here is one of them from my game when my opponent forgot to resign > >[D]6k1/3R4/3B4/5KP1/P1P5/1P2r3/8/8 w - - 0 1 > >I played Rd8+ and only after Kf7(kh7 is slower in losing) g6+ my opponent >resigned. > >Crafty evaluates Rd8+ as mate in 8. > >I could see the mate in 4 only when I played g6+ > >Uri Finally I found the time (was very busy today) and looked by curiosity up to the solution. Could find mate only by brute force search, since my selective was useless here. Mate is 8 moves deep. It took pretty long time as well to solve. 36 min. AMD 400Mhz. Solver don't use hash. Very interesting to see how mate is executed. Fine position. Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.