Author: Uri Blass
Date: 20:15:59 01/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2001 at 16:08:19, leonid wrote: >On January 26, 2001 at 09:06:27, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 26, 2001 at 07:08:14, leonid wrote: >> >>>On January 26, 2001 at 06:55:42, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Leonid!,I like miniatures better,so here are two of them[twins]: >>>> Werner Speckmann,1955 Mate in 17 >>>> [D]8/p7/8/2p5/p3Q3/K7/2r5/1k6 w >>>> Werner Speckmann,1955 Mate in 13 >>>> [D]8/8/4p3/2p5/p3Q3/K7/2r5/1k6 w >>> >>>Thanks! And what is was, some creation of problems or some positions that >>>resulted from real chess championship? >>> >>>Leonid. >> >>If you are interested in positions from human-human games there is no problem to >>find them. >> >>Here is one of them from my game when my opponent forgot to resign >> >>[D]6k1/3R4/3B4/5KP1/P1P5/1P2r3/8/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>I played Rd8+ and only after Kf7(kh7 is slower in losing) g6+ my opponent >>resigned. >> >>Crafty evaluates Rd8+ as mate in 8. >> >>I could see the mate in 4 only when I played g6+ >> >>Uri > >Good positions, but have you seen all those 8 moves for mate on the spot? Or was >you able to finding it after thinking 1 minute? No. I could not see the mate in 8 and only programs could see it. I could see mate only after my opponent blundered with Kf7. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.