Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 10:48:09 01/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2001 at 13:25:55, James T. Walker wrote: >Last December I archived all my comp/comp games (over 8000) and started a new >database. Since December I have had the following results at Blitz using 2 >Athlon 900 Thunderbird/256M machines and auto232. All except a very few games >were played at G/5 minutes. >Since I have not attempted to play an even number of games vs each opponent the >ratings cannot be taken too seriously. I have played games which I was most >interested in and which were the easiest to manage. For instance CM8K and Rebel >Century are a real pain to try to play auto232 games with so not many were >played. The Fritz 6b is replaced by Fritz 6e so I cannot play anymore games >with it. The ratings were computed with Fritz 6 GUI and are based on an average >ELO of 2350. The "gauge" ratings are just 150 points added to make the average >2500. > > Program Rating games (+150) >1. Gambit Tiger 1.0 2420 -- 201 2570 >2. Fritz 6b 2408 64 2558 >3. Fritz 6e 2386 566 2536 >4. Chess Tiger 13.0 2379 226 2529 >5. CM8K(8M) 2368 50 2518 >6. Shredder 5 2366 207 2516 >7. Junior 6.0 2354 130 2504 >8. Hiarcs 7.32 2352 142 2502 >9. Fritz 5.32 2348 204 2498 >10. Gambit Shredder 2348 174 2498 >11. Shredder 4 2319 79 2469 >12. Crafty 18.1 2265 227 2415 >13. Rebel Century 3.0 2232 46 2382 Hi! I think the results seem to be very realistic. No big difference vs longer-time conrol games. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.