Author: leonid
Date: 14:54:16 01/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2001 at 13:45:27, Paul wrote: >On January 27, 2001 at 13:17:09, leonid wrote: > >>On January 27, 2001 at 12:39:36, Paul wrote: >> >>>On January 27, 2001 at 11:35:13, leonid wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>>[D]qn1kbrqn/n1nqn1bp/bN1N1N1N/B1N1Nn1B/N1N1N1N1/8/1R1Q1R2/3K4 w - - >>>>> >>>>>Mate existe for sure in 12 moves. (Before I wrote 11.) Response was found by selective search and minimal number of moves is unknown. >>>> >>>>>Leonid. >>> >>>Wot ...? No Kangaroos? ;) >>>Ok, couldn't resist ... how about this: >>> >>>WM8 1. Nxa8 Ne3+ 2. Kc1 Qxc4+ 3. Ndxc4 N7d5 4. Bxc7+ Qxc7 5. Qxd5+ Nxd5 6. Ne6+ >>>Ke7 7. Nxd5+ Kxe6 8. Naxc7x >>> >>>Groetjes, >>>Paul >> >>Paul, please say me in simple words in how many moves you found the mate? >> >>Leonid. > >Hi! > >Leonid ... Leonid ... I even gave you a line! What don't you understand? >And WM8 means 'W'hite 'M'ates in '8' moves ... It took 7 minutes and 7 seconds >BTW (By The Way :) ... > >I see Heiner already found a mate in 7 ... Yuck! I think I'm gonna quit from >this 'mating' business, I'm 'always' missing by one move ... Don't worry, Paul! You found in 8 when I found in 12. When I went by curiosity to see how long it will take for my program to find those 7 moves, it was actually 2h and half compared with Heiner 15 minutes. So, stay here with me, Paul, for "group therapy" session. Make a company! Leonid. >:Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.