Author: Heiner Marxen
Date: 12:13:01 01/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2001 at 14:47:16, Paul wrote: >On January 28, 2001 at 14:30:50, Heiner Marxen wrote: >>Chest needs 95 seconds (K7/600 60MB hash). Look Paul, your program is >>much faster than Chest! :-) >> >>Heiner > >Thanks ... just at the right time ... I needed that :) :-) You should not compare a playing program with Chest. They perform quite different jobs, even when the result from both is a mate PV. >I also see that you've reduced your hash to a mere 60MB! That's very considerate >of you, Heiner! You really shouldn't have done that ;) That is, because another job with 350 MB is still running all the time. [The mate in 17 twin. My first guess of 8 hours turns out to be too small: it is at 32 hours, now, and will need 1-2 days more... just another guess] There is still enough memory left to add another 60MB Chest running, but not much more (I tried 120MB, and the system started to page as mad). >I just manage to get 192MB hash out of my 256MB machine, but it takes a while >before calculating starts the first time, due to swapping! > >:Paul Yeah, paging/swapping is to be avoided. Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.