Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:06:48 01/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2001 at 15:33:40, Christophe Theron wrote: >Thanks a lot Thorsten. I have just posted an answer to Jorge which puts me in >your "materialist" list of people. :-)))) i saw :-))) >>but : despite this ---- you are right. >He is just wrong in his conclusions. Can can believe all you want, you can even >try to demonstrate what you believe in, you can even succeed in demonstrating >it, but it does not allow you to throw statistical relevance down the drain. statistics is for people uncapable to understand the world far from 400 times doing something. kiss the right girl ONE time, no statistics, no big numbers. but you will find out better than 400 times kissing all kind of girls and relating it "objectively". there is no better method to measure than the feelings and the emotions. computers are that kind of stupid because they don't have this senses yet. would you trust a computer which girl is the right one for you ? would you trust a computer that drives your car ? > Christophe, former "new paradigm", now yet another "materialist". :-))) du hast dir den schuh selbst angezogen. it was you falling into this trap, not me. of course one can differenciate that different programs profit different from speed.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.