Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 13:36:30 01/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2001 at 16:06:48, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On January 28, 2001 at 15:33:40, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>Thanks a lot Thorsten. I have just posted an answer to Jorge which puts me in
>>your "materialist" list of people.
>
>:-))))
>
>i saw :-)))
>
>
>>>but : despite this ---- you are right.
>
>>He is just wrong in his conclusions. Can can believe all you want, you can even
>>try to demonstrate what you believe in, you can even succeed in demonstrating
>>it, but it does not allow you to throw statistical relevance down the drain.
>
>statistics is for people uncapable to understand the world far from 400
>times doing something.
>
>kiss the right girl ONE time, no statistics, no big numbers.
>but you will find out better than 400 times kissing all kind of
>girls and relating it "objectively".
OK, so next time you want to make a baby, just launch ONE spermatozoid.
If you don't believe in statistics, maybe mother nature does? Surely she does.
Christophe
>there is no better method to measure than the feelings and the emotions.
>computers are that kind of stupid because they don't have this senses
>yet.
>
>would you trust a computer which girl is the right one for you ?
>
>would you trust a computer that drives your car ?
>
>> Christophe, former "new paradigm", now yet another "materialist".
>
>:-)))
>
>du hast dir den schuh selbst angezogen.
>it was you falling into this trap, not me.
>
>of course one can differenciate that different programs profit different
>from speed.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.