Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: I mean is it prooved that Deep Fritz teally is better than Fritz

Author: Georg Langrath

Date: 08:15:33 01/29/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 29, 2001 at 09:21:29, José Carlos wrote:

>On January 29, 2001 at 00:54:16, Georg Langrath wrote:
>
>>Are there tournaments between programs that prove that two or more processors
>>have advantages before one processor. Or is the several processors programs a
>>disappointment?
>>
>>Georg
>
>  If you want to paint a wall, you'll finish sooner if someone else helps you
>(other processors). If you only have 1 brush (no SMP programs) you won't notice
>any difference. If you have n brushes (SMP program) and 1 person helps you (2
>processor machine) and the other person is attending the telephone (1 processor
>doing other tasks) you'll still be faster than if you're alone, but not much
>faster :)
>  Hope this clarifies.
>
>  José C.

I think I understand the theory of several processors. But until now there were
no commercial programs that can use several processors. I mean are there
engine-engine matches that really proofs that Deep Fritz with two processors is
better than Fritz 6? Or are the several processors commercial program a
disappointment? Or is it too early to say?

Georg Langrath




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.