Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 01:56:04 01/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2001 at 03:26:58, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 30, 2001 at 03:12:19, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>Let's take 4 first LCT II position, which are middlegame positions: >> >>r3kb1r/3n1pp1/p6p/2pPp2q/Pp2N3/3B2PP/1PQ2P2/R3K2R w KQkq - ; id "POS-01";c0 >>"Chernin - Miles, Tunis 1985, 1.d6!"; >>1k1r3r/pp2qpp1/3b1n1p/3pNQ2/2pP1P2/2N1P3/PP4PP/1K1RR3 b - - ; id "POS-02";c0 >>"Lilienthal - Botvinnik, Moskau 1945, 1...Bb4!"; >>r6k/pp4p1/2p1b3/3pP3/7q/P2B3r/1PP2Q1P/2K1R1R1 w - - ; id "POS-03";c0 "Boissel - >>Boulard, corr. 1994, 1.Qc5!"; >>1nr5/2rbkppp/p3p3/Np6/2PRPP2/8/PKP1B1PP/3R4 b - - ; id "POS-04";c0 "Kaplan - >>Kopec, USA 1975, 1...e5!"; >> >>And let any program to calculate each position 3 minutes and then count average >>NPS from all four... > >NPS of what? >The move generator? >Make/unmake? >Nodes used in search? >or >??? I forgot: purpose of test is to compare program in different hardwares. So it doesn't make any difference how NPS is counted. And it will replace programs own bench commands. Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.