Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: If 75 Games are not considered a Statistical proof, neither is the SSDF.

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 06:58:32 01/30/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 30, 2001 at 09:50:37, David Wilke wrote:

>On January 30, 2001 at 09:14:48, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:
>
>>On January 30, 2001 at 09:06:09, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>Ever since I matched Nimzo 8 vs Junior 6 using my AMD K6-2 500 MHz and also
>>>matched them using my Athlon 800 MHz at G\60 and got different scores; some
>>>people argued that those games were not statistically significants to proof
>>>anything at all. Then we must disregard the SSDF rating list, since each Chess
>>>program only play 40 games against each other and not 200 games.
>>
>>I think that you have misunderstood how SSDF works.
>>
>>ex.: Which rating is the most reliable:
>>
>>1. 400 games played with 200 games against 2 others from the SSDF-list
>>2. 400 games played with 40 games against 10 others from the SSDF-list
>>
>>I´m sure it´s nr. 2.
>
>If it is number 2, then that really only shows the possibility of an overall
>rating, not a rating vs one program. It could also not show a true rating, as
>the program faces programs on weaker hardware.

I do not see the problem with programs on weaker hardware.
I play against humans who can think faster than me or the opposite.

Does it mean that my rating is not a true rating?

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.