Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 02:29:27 02/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2001 at 05:15:24, Uri Blass wrote: Dear Uri, >On February 01, 2001 at 04:11:36, Sandro Necchi wrote: > >>On February 01, 2001 at 03:48:09, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>Dear Uri, >> >>>On February 01, 2001 at 02:20:33, Sandro Necchi wrote: >>> >>> >>><snipped> >>>>No, maybe I did not clearly explain what I meant. I said that a friend of mine, >>>>testing the program regardless of the opening book, said that it was 100 points >>>>better than Fritz 6a. So it was not the book making it stronger, but the engine >>>>being stronger. >>> >>>My impression about the engine is different. >>> >>>I used ahredder5 for a long time to analyze positions from my correspondence >>>games when I was in theory. >>>If the engine is 100 elo better than I expect it to find good moves in the >>>opening without opwning book. >> >>I think that to expect PCs chess programs "to make theory" is wrong. The horizon >>effect should create a lot of problems on this matter. it really depends on the >>positions. In some program A should do better than program B and viceversa. >> >>> >>>I found that shredder suggested me a stupid sacrifice and only after many hours >>>the score went down and it converge to the theory move Re1. >>> >>>Here is the opening in my correspondence game against yoav dothan(I am white) >>> >>>1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.Nc3 >> >>Even if this is probably the best move, I think for Shredder 5. Bd3 should be >>better after some moves. I know that the program evaulation is better for Nc3, >>but it is important the program position understanding after some moves... > >Unfortunately I did not have Shredder at this point of the game. > >I have another game when I know that I did not follow shredder's opening book >and I believe that I was right. > >It is the game against GM har aven. > >1.g3 d5 2.f4 h5 3.Nf3 h4 4.Nxh4 e5 Quite interesting! > >I believe that 4...e5 is the best move(this move surprised my opponet that gave >me a long condition for 4...Rxh4) > >He thought a long time and played 5.Ng2(I think that I have a good position also >after 5.Nf3 exf4) > >I played a novelty 5...Nf6(I found only 5...Nh6 in my database) and I believe >that I have an advantage in the game after 6.e3 Nc6 7.d3 Bg4 8.Be2 Qd7 9.Nd2) Well, in the databases there are a lot of things missing and wrong evaluations based only on human games. I believe there is A LOT of room for improvements, but it takes a lot of time and testing. > >Uri Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.