Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:10:56 02/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 1998 at 16:59:02, Detlef Pordzik wrote: >In a " different world " I posted something similar. >It's kinda modern to insist F5 to be whatsoever. >Countin' bugs, flaws.......just complainin' >then the thing hit the top - and the romour starts all over >again. >Special version, detects, that it's added to autoplay, no commercial >available book, ect. >ME TOO would have felt more comfortable to see a knowledge based >prog on top - 'cause I assume this to be the only way to increase >playin' strenght on mid-range. >But now it's a fast searcher...well - why not. >All the programmers - and we've got around a dozen high qualified >can have a try to change this with teir next release. >Nevertheless : >I also think, it's a little unfair towards Frans - nobody nearly >respectin' the benefit of the new engine - it didn't fall outta >heaven anyway - and it didn't hit the top 'cause of it's GUI or >tree function....correct ? >When he won at Hongkong, there was a similar phenomenon - the >majority was debatin', who was missin', not who won - >the whole thing is commercial, in the end - but there are " still " >humans, >who are the makers of their " brain childs ". >I, at least, unimportant enough, 'd like to say : >great work,Frans....congrats... > >ELVIS well said. I agree completely. I don't like some of the moves it plays, but it manages to combine tactics, active play, and reasonable endgames (most of the time) in a nice way...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.