Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty 17.07 Why not try 17.14

Author: Chris Taylor

Date: 10:52:32 02/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On February 01, 2001 at 16:54:24, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On February 01, 2001 at 14:46:19, Chris Taylor wrote:
>
>>On February 01, 2001 at 14:22:45, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>>
>>>Do you decide which Crafty version to use on the basis of a reliable rating? I
>>>have no idea if 17.07 is the strongest version under the match conditions you
>>>use, but it might be a worthy consideration to upgrade. At least for the sake of
>>>those that use the latest version.
>>>
>>>Mogens.
>>
>>Last time I looked Crafty 17.14 was on the Chessbase site.  Don't know it it is
>>stronger than 17.07, but it is newer!
>>
>I disagree.  The testing should continue with 17.07 until an accurate ELO is
>clearly established.  If you always move to the strongest available version, you
>will never learn how strong it is.  Since crafty is updated frequently, you will
>never complete the thousands of games necessary.  The completed set of games
>should also prove useful to analyze possible weaknesses.
>
>It is sort of like the man who had a pile of leaves in his yard.  He started to
>rake them into a pile.  Then he noticed his neighbor's yard.  There were lots of
>leaves that were not raked at all.  So he jumped the fencd and started to rake.
>But he noticed after a bit that his neighbor's neighbor's yard was not raked at
>all, and the yard he was working in was not as bad as that one.  So he jumped
>the fence and started on the next yard.  He kept jumping fences and raking
>leaves, but he never managed to create a tidy pile.

I work all day, and I have never made a tidy pile?  Enuf to live on tho.....
Guess if a job needs doing, it needs doing by me.  17.14 against the rest.

Autoplayer on standby.............

Chris Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.