Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Mate in 46

Author: Heiner Marxen

Date: 12:12:39 02/02/01

Go up one level in this thread

On February 02, 2001 at 13:10:23, Paul wrote:

>On February 02, 2001 at 12:58:53, Heiner Marxen wrote:
>>The above line follows exactly my PV from above.  Unfortunately Juniors PV
>>is not complete, so I cannot investigate this further.  But when Chest is
>>right with #46, then Junior should have said #44 (or larger), but not #42.
>>That would be a bug, wouldn't it?
>Hi Heiner!
>I think Junior may have a bug, because in another thread there was this message:
>in which Crafty and Gandalf said Mate in 33 (my program agrees with that) and
>Junior said 31 ... also a difference of 2.

Aha, thanks.
And when Enrique manages to provide a complete PV for me (in a few days)
I will be able to check it myself.

>PS: BTW ... it's not important, but did you finish the Mate in 17 problem?

It is still running, for over 6 days by now  :-(
I'll report back, when it finishes...  IF it finishes ;-)


This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.