Author: James T. Walker
Date: 17:06:42 02/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 02, 2001 at 17:25:06, Ernst Walet wrote: >On February 02, 2001 at 11:31:17, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Hello Enrique, >>How did you decide that Gambit would have won? Did you replay the ending? I >>was going to try it if I could find the complete game score but haven't found it >>yet. By the way, Shredder 5 says it's mate in 47 (after 76:16). >>Jim > > >This is the analysis of Fritz6, P3-500, 100MB hash, 5 piece EGTB. It sees a >mate within one and a half minute. > >Ernst. > > >New position >8/6kn/3B3p/5K1B/8/8/8/8 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 6: > >1...Nf6 > +- (2.72) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >1...Nf6 2.Be5 > +- (2.75) Depth: 2/5 00:00:00 >1...Nf6-- > +- (3.31) Depth: 3/5 00:00:00 >1...Nf6-- 2.Be5 Kf8 3.Bxf6 > +- (5.87) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 >1...Ng5! > +- (5.84) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 >1...Ng5! 2.Be5+ Kf8 3.Kf4 > +- (2.72) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 >1...Ng5 2.Bb4 Kh7 3.Bg6+ Kg8 > +- (2.75) Depth: 4/10 00:00:00 1kN >1...Ng5 2.Bb4 Kg8 3.Bc3 Kh7 > +- (2.75) Depth: 5/10 00:00:00 1kN >1...Ng5 2.Bb4 Kg8 3.Bc3 Kf8 4.Ke5 > +- (2.75) Depth: 6/12 00:00:00 2kN >1...Ng5 2.Bb4 Kg8 3.Kg6 Nf7 4.Kf5 > +- (2.75) Depth: 7/13 00:00:00 6kN, tb=1 >1...Ng5 2.Bb4 Kg8 3.Kg6 Nf7 4.Bc3 Kf8 5.Kf5 > +- (2.78) Depth: 8/14 00:00:00 11kN, tb=5 >1...Ng5 2.Be5+ Kh7 3.Bb2 Nh3 4.Bd1 Ng5 5.Bc2 Kg8 6.Kf4 > +- (2.87) Depth: 9/17 00:00:00 42kN, tb=29 >1...Ng5 2.Be5+ Kh7 3.Bb2 Nh3 4.Bg6+ Kg8 5.Kg4 Ng5 6.Kh5 > +- (2.87) Depth: 10/18 00:00:00 64kN, tb=69 >1...Ng5 2.Be5+ Kh7 3.Bb2 Nh3 4.Bg6+ Kg8 5.Kg4 Ng5 6.Kh5 > +- (2.87) Depth: 11/20 00:00:00 140kN, tb=199 >1...Ng5 2.Be5+ Kh7 3.Bb2 Nh3 4.Bg6+ Kg8 5.Kg4 Ng5 6.Kh5 > +- (2.87) Depth: 12/19 00:00:01 225kN, tb=422 >1...Ng5 2.Be5+ Kh7 3.Bb2 Nh3 4.Bg6+ Kg8 5.Be8 Kf8 6.Ba4 > +- (3.16) Depth: 13/21 00:00:02 387kN, tb=941 >1...Ng5 2.Be5+ Kh7 3.Bd1 Nf7 4.Bb2 Nd6+ 5.Kg4 Kg6 6.Bc2+ > +- (3.31) Depth: 14/26 00:00:04 920kN, tb=2491 >1...Ng5-- > +- (3.62) Depth: 15/28 00:00:07 1514kN, tb=4083 >1...Ng5-- > +- (3.62) Depth: 15/28 00:00:08 1695kN, tb=4833 >1...Ng5-- > +- (3.94) Depth: 16/24 00:00:09 1826kN, tb=5450 >1...Ng5-- 2.Be5+ Kh7 > +- (3.97) Depth: 16/24 00:00:10 2244kN, tb=7216 >1...Ng5! > +- (3.66) Depth: 17/26 00:00:17 3917kN, tb=13736 >1...Ng5-- > +- (3.97) Depth: 18/27 00:00:20 4793kN, tb=16187 >1...Ng5-- 2.Be5+ Kg8 3.Kg6 > +- (#74) Depth: 18/30 00:01:27 21784kN, tb=94972 >1...Kh8! > +- (#75) Depth: 18/30 00:02:09 35644kN, tb=146878 >1...Nf8! > +- (#77) Depth: 18/30 00:02:52 48856kN, tb=193075 > >(Ernst, ChessCity 02.02.2001) Yes, I let Fritz run longer and it found "mate in 33". It may even be shorter if you let it search longer. But as Bob said, who cares as long as it's mate. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.