Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 06:48:27 02/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2001 at 09:20:59, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On February 03, 2001 at 08:19:16, Hristo wrote: > >>Managed to play 10 games with crafty running on 1Ghz Athlon >>and 450MHz PIII computers. >>Crafty 1G : 1 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 1 1 = 7 >>Crafty 450M: 0 .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 0 .5 0 0 = 3 >> >>on average crafty pulls 630K NPS on the 1G Athlon and about >>250K on the 450M PIII. >> >>"What does it all mean Bazil?" ;-) >> >>hristo > >Set up the time control to twice as much for the 450 MHz and run another much >and provive the result later. I will bet on the 450 MHz to win the match even if >the NPS is 2.2 more on the 1Ghz than on the 450 MHz. I did a similar test >between my AMD 800 MHz vs my second P.C.K6-2 500 MHz for this test I provided a >time control of 60 minutes per game for the 500 Mhz vs 45 Minutes per game for >the 800 MHz just to match the equivalence of the NPS for both machines and the >result ended in favor of the 500 MHz P.C. by 1 game after 15 games total W6 L5 >D4. In your case you can simply equal the performance of your 1 GHz by doubling the time control on your 450 MHz. PS: I forgot to mentioned that this test was done 6 months ago using my old CM 6000 program, in which I had to run it manually. >Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.