Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Microsoft Visual C slower than Gnu C ?

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 06:42:40 02/28/98

Go up one level in this thread


On February 28, 1998 at 00:04:33, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On February 28, 1998 at 00:01:06, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>I worked hard to port Tiger from Gnu C (free compiler) to Microsoft
>>Visual C++ 4.0.
>>
>>Well... What I get is a 10% SLOWDOWN!!! All speed optimizations turned
>>ON. And the fastest code is achieved when I select 486 instead of
>>Pentium!
>>
>>Several possible explanations:
>>1) I should upgrade to a better version of MSVC...
>
>absolutely.  Get MSVC version 5.0.  The code optimizer is far better
>and knows about the pentium architecture.  4.0 does not so far as I
>know.
>
>>2) I am calling a fonction that is very time consuming under MSVC, and
>>is cheap under GnuC...
>
>doubtful.  msvc 5 makes crafty about 10% faster than even the best
>pentium
>compiler group version of gcc.  and that is without using the assembly
>code
>we use with gcc...

OK. I'll buy the latest MSVC.

Maybe I should also try to download the latest GCC version. I have heard
that it has been improved for Pentium code generation "recently". I'm
using the June 97 version.

Thanks Bob!


    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.