Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:04:39 02/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2001 at 18:49:13, David Dahlem wrote: >Using infinite analysis, Fritz6, Nimzo8, and Gandalf see this as a mate in 5 or >mate in 6. > >[D]b6b/1R4R1/2nNNn2/8/8/2B1kB2/pPr2rPK/8 w - - 0 1 > >But isn't it really a draw, according to the following line? > >1. Nf5+ Kd3 2. Nf4+ Kc4 3. Ne3+ Kc5 4. Nd3+ Kd6 5. Nc4+ Ke6 6. Nc5+ Kf5 7. Nd6+ >Kf4 8. Ne6+ Ke3 9. Nf5+ 1/2-1/2 > >What do other programs say about this position? > >Dave Instead of 4.Nd3+ white can play 4.b4+ Nxb4 5.Rgc7+ with mate in the next move Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.