Author: Paul Petersson
Date: 09:45:34 02/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2001 at 10:27:48, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On February 04, 2001 at 09:37:17, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 04, 2001 at 09:05:05, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>I always thought that Deep Fritz perform better only when using a single >>>processor higher than 800 MHz, but on a single processor lower than 500 MHz >>>it will not end up being first on the SSDF List it will fall behind Rebel Tiger >>>on 2nd place or probably 3rd behind Shredder 5. >> >>I guess that Deep Fritz is going to be number 1 in the ssdf > >I think so too. > >>(Tiger13 is not >>tested because the programmer asked the ssdf to wait to an upgrade). >> >>My guess is that Tiger is going to be number 1 later when it is tested because >>an improved version is going to be tested and not because Fritz likes more >>Enrique's hardware. >> >>Uri > >After the update, Gambit may top the SSDF list. An improved engine and >tablebases will increase its rating quite a bit, but the Tigers need also a >better learner. Hi Do you think that Gambit is stronger than Tiger 13.x? Christophe seems to think the opposite, and I would tend to agree with him. BTW, how much stronger would you estimate Shredder 5.0 to be compared to S4? Did you run your secret test thru S5? Paul >Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.