Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 10:20:11 02/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2001 at 12:45:34, Paul Petersson wrote: >On February 04, 2001 at 10:27:48, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On February 04, 2001 at 09:37:17, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 04, 2001 at 09:05:05, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>I always thought that Deep Fritz perform better only when using a single >>>>processor higher than 800 MHz, but on a single processor lower than 500 MHz >>>>it will not end up being first on the SSDF List it will fall behind Rebel Tiger >>>>on 2nd place or probably 3rd behind Shredder 5. >>> >>>I guess that Deep Fritz is going to be number 1 in the ssdf >> >>I think so too. >> >>>(Tiger13 is not >>>tested because the programmer asked the ssdf to wait to an upgrade). >>> >>>My guess is that Tiger is going to be number 1 later when it is tested because >>>an improved version is going to be tested and not because Fritz likes more >>>Enrique's hardware. >>> >>>Uri >> >>After the update, Gambit may top the SSDF list. An improved engine and >>tablebases will increase its rating quite a bit, but the Tigers need also a >>better learner. > >Hi > >Do you think that Gambit is stronger than Tiger 13.x? Christophe seems to think >the opposite, and I would tend to agree with him. In the beta group we had long discussions about this topic. After many games nobody had evidence one way or the other, but we thought that the difference between Tiger 13 and Gambit 1 was probably less than 20 points. I don't know either which one is stronger, but I like Gambit much better. >BTW, how much stronger would you estimate Shredder 5.0 to be compared to S4? About 50 points, I guess. >Did >you run your secret test thru S5? Sure! :) Depending on the settings, S5 scores between 30 and 60 points better than S4. With default settings, +30. Enrique >Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.