Author: leonid
Date: 15:30:58 02/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2001 at 12:43:45, Christophe Theron wrote: >On February 04, 2001 at 09:13:28, leonid wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>If you like to solve one forced mate... >> >>[D]6R1/r3P1b1/6kN/1bP1P1np/3P1B1p/4P3/pq4N1/r1n3QK w - - >> >>Please indicate you result. >> >>Thanks, >>Leonid. > > >Tiger solves it in 0.05s: Nxh4+... mate in 8 (K6-2 450, 6Mb hash). Is there a >shorter mate? Probably somebody already responded before me. Anyway, mate in 8 is the right response and time is very good. I doubt that mine will do the same taking in consideration that you use here big hash. Hash is very useful when position ask for deep, brute force search. It could be counter productive when position can be easely taken by selective search. Mine took this for the time less that 0.055 sec. on AMD 400Mhz without hash. Leonid. > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.