Author: James T. Walker
Date: 15:46:08 02/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2001 at 13:19:22, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 05, 2001 at 11:23:32, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On February 05, 2001 at 10:27:43, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 05, 2001 at 09:42:07, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On February 05, 2001 at 01:27:34, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 04, 2001 at 23:11:23, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 04, 2001 at 18:29:12, James T. Walker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>How many programs can now be programmed for the new FIDE time control of 40/75 >>>>>>>plus all/15 with +30 seconds per move from move 1 ?? >>>>>>>Jim >>>>>> >>>>>>Of course. Not the programs have a single problem, >>>>>>the FIDE has a problem. >>>>>> >>>>>>We already knew the FIDE president's biggest >>>>>>pal is called Saddam Hussain, but the way he acts >>>>>>definitely has features which are more as un-democratic, >>>>>>the features currently are definitely getting described best >>>>>>as 'stupid'. >>>>>> >>>>>>We don't want to end up in with a draughts level of 60 moves in 1 >>>>>>hour, in order to be home before dinner... >>>>>> >>>>>>Perhaps my next try is to register a blitz event to get FIDE >>>>>>rated, cuz i'm good in blitz and i might get a few more people >>>>>>for the blitz event... >>>>>> >>>>>>Vincent >>>>> >>>>>As usual Vincent your post is a complete nonsense diatribe which has nothing to >>>>>do with my question. If you are going to post nonsense here why don't you at >>>>>least start your own thread! >>>>>Jim >>>> >>>>First of all this is not nonsense what i write. >>>>Illumnizov wanted to do a match in Bagdad >>>> >>>>Karpov-Kamsky >>>> >>>>this was a few years ago. Only because both players didn't want to >>>>match didn't continue. >>> >>>I think that james did not mean to say that you are wrong when he said nonsense >>>but he meant to the fact that it was not an answer to the question that he >>>asked. >>> >>>> >>>>Secondly how about the stupidiness you post, of course software has no >>>>problems with the time control. Even a beginner can figure that out >>>>if he clicks 'levels' and sees what he can enter in the diff progs. >>> >>>Programmers have no program to teach their program to use the new time control. >>> >>>It does not mean that the programs of today can use the new time control and I >>>understood that James walker meant to ask if the programs of today can use the >>>new time control. >>> >>>Fritz engines can use fisher time control and can also 90 minutes/40 moves +15 >>>minutes/game but they are not programmed to use the sum of these time control >>>and in order to use them in the fide events you have to change the time control >>>manually during the game. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Thank you Uri, >>Of course you are exactly right. I have no Chess Program that I know of right >>now that will accept the new FIDE time controls. Most computer chess tournament >>rules forbid you from changing time controls after the game has started. That >>means that you must be able to program both time controls at the beginning of >>the game unless your program "ask" for an update in the time remaining later in >>the game. I do not own Deep Fritz or Nimzo 8 or Gandalf but as far as I know >>none of the programs I have now are capable of being set for the new FIDE time >>controls. >>Jim > >Comon, i had this already in diep version 1.xx implemented all the >possible time controls! > >Latest version i even have the GO way which in chessworld is called >'bronstein' level. > >Anyway when you play with a program in a FIDE rated event using that >time control, let me know :) > >I bet we are going to see many computer-human matches in the new >FIDE level :) Vincent,are you drunk or just silly? I will not be playing a program in any FIDE events and I doubt if you will either. Programs have traditionally immitated common human tournament time controls. I'm really not interested in deip and it's time controls. I'm only interested in the top commercial programs which I own or am considering buying. Diep does not fit into that category at this time. Hopefully it will someday soon. As for seeing many computer-human matches in the new FIDE level, it's hard to do when none of the top programs can immitate them. You can bet that new programs will adopt a setting that conforms to the new FIDE time controls soon. Probably in the next versions. Why don't you try to be constructive instead of argumentative? Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.