Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Was not the Rebel Van der Weil Match Worthy of News Coverage?

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 01:01:03 02/06/01

Go up one level in this thread


On February 05, 2001 at 20:41:59, Garry Evans wrote:

>
>  I was surprised when recieving my febuary issue of Chess Life that there was
>no mention of the Rebel Van Der Weil match. Wasn't this match a Milstone in
>Computer Chess and Chess in General!! This was not a blitz match, which
>computers have already been shown to be superior, but a Standard Tournament time
>control match.  When i see matches of this magnitude ignored by the chess media,
>first thing comes to my mind is that it is human bias against chess computers
>that we have seen time and time again. Or did Chess life mention the match but I
>just overlooked it? If so my apologies to chess life.

I am not surprised. With all respect to John he is not a wellknown
name. And if you don't know about his specialty (killing computers)
the match was not special at all. It was special here but not to the
wide public.

Ed




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.