Author: James
Date: 17:33:00 02/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2001 at 12:11:51, Heiner Marxen wrote: >On February 06, 2001 at 11:47:31, James wrote: > >>On February 05, 2001 at 17:21:30, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Took nearly an hour! >>> >>>[D]2r3k1/5ppp/7r/Q7/3P1p2/1N3Pnq/PP3K1P/R5R1 b - - >>> >>>E:\>chest319 -b -z 9 -M 200 m09.epd >>>2r3k1/5ppp/7r/Q7/3P1p2/1N3Pnq/PP3K1P/R5R1 b - - acn 429658002; acs 3414; bm >>>Ne4+; ce 32750; dm 9; pv Ne4+ fxe4 Qe3+ Kf1 Rxh2 Rxg7+ Kxg7 Qe5+ f6 Qe7+ Kg6 >>>Qxf6+ Kxf6 e5+ Kg6 e6 Qf2#; >>....Think someone had better look at NxN after Ne4+ before taking a claom of >>mate in 9, in fact, white wins if Ne4+ ... Black can win though with Qe6 rather >>than Ne4. It is an interesting position that shows how differently programs can >>think. duh, u r exactly right, i set the knight on c3 rather than b3.. how did i do that? > >Uh, that is quite a funny knight you have, jumping from b3 to e4... >The NxN you propose is not a legal move. Please double check >the position. If you still think, that the above "mate in 9" is not >correct, please indicate exactly, which white move would avoid the mate, >and I will try to answer with a mate PV. > >Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.