Author: Garry Evans
Date: 18:54:27 02/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2001 at 21:47:52, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On February 05, 2001 at 21:41:56, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On February 05, 2001 at 20:41:59, Garry Evans wrote: >> >>> >>> I was surprised when recieving my febuary issue of Chess Life that there was >>>no mention of the Rebel Van Der Weil match. Wasn't this match a Milstone in >>>Computer Chess and Chess in General!! This was not a blitz match, which >>>computers have already been shown to be superior, but a Standard Tournament time >>>control match. When i see matches of this magnitude ignored by the chess media, >>>first thing comes to my mind is that it is human bias against chess computers >>>that we have seen time and time again. Or did Chess life mention the match but I >>>just overlooked it? If so my apologies to chess life. >> >> >>Subscribe to the Computer Chess Report and you will see this coverage in detail >>and many others, related specifically for Computer related issues. >> >>Pichard. True Chess Life is not a computer Chess magazine, but I would atleast think that they would be consistent, I have seen them cover computer/human matches far less significant. So why all of a sudden stop, when the most important match of all takes place?? There has to be bias here, common sense.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.