Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 02:52:58 03/01/98
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 1998 at 23:13:44, Detlef Pordzik wrote: >Nevertheless - the arguments, as certain - non commericial book was used >- >is, at least, astonishing....we should wait, until there's proof of this >item. Commercial PowerBooks were used. >The other astonishing assuming " it detects, that it's connected to >autoplay + then is able to detect the opponent " - is too much for my >dull brain - I can't >even comment this - lack of knowledge. Fritz stores used time and hash table size together with move eval and depth in the game score. On a P200MMX with identical hash table size, the "commercial" verion (i.e. the one available on the Junior CD, shame on ChessBase for this move) will make precisely the same moves. >1st : CB stated, that they were sick + tired that F 3.01 + F4 were >tested only >with 512 K RAM - anybody of SSDF friends able to answer this ? >Now - this'd explain me the RAM campaign for this " RAM eater " >better.... I don't remember CB stating this. I had some email correspondence with the SSDF guys 1.5 years ago and they told me: a) they used mainly 8 MB machines and some 16 MB P90s. From this I figured who much hash tables would be left for Fritz ... b) they mostly used the initial (buggy) 4.0 version b) 2.) as some F4 versions had allegedly permanent brain disabled by default, the SSDF didn't change that setting .... >3rd : now - I know my " old chap " Thorsten for many years...and his >uncommon >way of approachin' things, i.e. a prog, it's benefit - or not. He is always right - except when he is wrong ;-)) Moritz
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.