Author: James T. Walker
Date: 21:11:19 02/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2001 at 17:51:59, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On February 08, 2001 at 14:11:02, James T. Walker wrote: > >>I replayed the last game of the 20 game set. Rebel Century 3.0 won so the score >>for Fritz 6 vs Rebel Century 3.0 is: >>using auto232 Fritz 14 Rebel 6 >>manual games Fritz 11.5 Rebel 8.5 >> >>So far in Junior 6.0 games: >>Auto232-- Junior 2.5 Rebel 1.5 >>Manual --- Junior 0.5 Rebel 1.5 >> >>This is a very long process which may take several months to complete. I >>wondere if anyone else has done a similiar test? >>Jim > >Hi! > >Yes, I have tried it with the help of Fritz log-file. First I played auto, if I >remember correct between Fritz5.32 and Rebel9, then I forced the same opening >and entered the moves following the log-file. Some games was identical from >first to the last move but sometime one of them (I believe mostly Fritz) played >another move probably because I missed the "timing". I never saw something >strange. > >Bertil Hello Bertil, Thank you for your input. I am mostly interested in the performance difference between the two setups. Ed says that the auto232 is damaging the Rebel engine/performance. I am trying to find proof of this by comparing the performance using auto232 and not using auto232. I don't care if games repeat or not. In my opinion timing is too critical to make games repeat when doing manual input. I hope to play 100 games manual and 100 games using auto232 to see if there is a difference in performance. My first impression is that there is a difference but I would like more evidence just to satisfy my curiosity. The game/1hour is taking a long time so I may change to game/30 minutes to speed things up. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.