Author: Garry Evans
Date: 03:08:15 02/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2001 at 06:06:10, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On February 09, 2001 at 05:55:40, Garry Evans wrote: > >> >> It would be very interesting to see a match between Gambit Tiger and IM >>Wegner, since the latter thinks gambit tiger plays so badly, and has so many >>weakness. No doubt the I.M. would lose badly! I wonder how something that >>sopposedly plays so badly does so well in the "Linares of Computer chess" the >>strong cadaques tourney?? Perhaps Gambit's play is above the understanding of >>Wegner? One can only wonder, since it makes no sense to evaluate gambit so >>harshly, and observe the program winning victory after Victory? If IM Wegner is >>correct in his evaluation of Gambit tiger, would it not be fair to say that the >>other programs, that finished beneath gambit tiger Played even worse? > >I think you've managed to misread and misinterpret the comments made by Hannu >Wegner. Ok Enlighten me? What is the correct interpretation of his Words? >Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.