Author: Werner Schuele
Date: 09:55:59 02/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2001 at 12:45:55, Stephen A. Boak wrote: >On February 10, 2001 at 10:20:17, Werner Schuele wrote: > >>With its nomal settings CM8000 has not many chances to beat GT. Because CM8000 >>has used only about 30 mins after 60 moves I set GT to 60+1 and CM8000 to 60+15. >>This works well until there are not more than 100 moves (clocks show equal >>times). The result was GT - CM 6.5-3.5: > >I wonder how much adverse effect does the default CM8000 1MB hash table size >have on CM8000 performance? > >For longer time controls, I think this reduces CM8000 performance substantially. > >At your time controls (supposedly 60 seconds minimum per move?) I can't guess >the effects, but I suspect it impedes CM8000 from performing at its best, >anytime CM8000 actually ponders for at least a minute or two on a move. > >--Steve Normally I use CM8000 with 128 MB hash (also on this test). Search times have been 1 to 3 minutes, so also 64 or 32 MB would have been enough. Werner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.