Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 14:05:27 02/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
Chris,
Your point is well made. There is much argument when a person says engine
V is stronger than engine X. It is much safer to post/say "This is the outcome
of my tournament". The math-heads can then take your results along with hundreds
of others and see what they see. Then someone will complain about the time
control used. ;) bk
On February 10, 2001 at 15:37:25, Chris Taylor wrote:
>Snip**
>
>I could post some statistical tables with the number of games and the associated
>error margins. Would you then have a look at them?
>
>Christophe
>
>I for one would like to see these tables.
>I am playing, such a large number of games. 200 blitz 5 mins... Then 200 1 hour.
>This whole subject is fascinating. I play small set-ups between various
>programs. There is no plan or outcome set, just match'em up and see what
>happens. In my case I don't figure anything special in what I do. Just two
>programs playing the noble game of chess. And may I add there are some dam good
>chess programs playing each other, it is a shame there is a winner? and a
>second placed.
>
>Chris Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.