Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:13:40 02/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2001 at 15:36:24, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 12, 2001 at 15:10:24, Thorsten Czub wrote: ><snipped> >>but nimzo8 is IMO (out of 2 sample 40/120 games) different. >>the main lines make more sense. > >I am surprised to read it because Nimzo8(based on another post) is losing in >the ssdf games 6-3 against Shredder2 when Shredder2 has a slower hardware. > >Uri i don't see why this is in contradiction to my statements. it can lose agaainst shredder2 in all kind of results. shredder2 is not my reference. and i have NO idea how any other of todays programs would play against shredder2. i am talking about todays programs. i am - at the moment - positively surprised. i would not write if it would not be the case.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.