Author: Mark Young
Date: 06:10:21 03/03/98
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 1998 at 04:23:21, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >Your results don't mean anything. You can't quesion hundreds of games >which have been played by the SSDF by playing a couple of games. When >you play 100 games, your result still has a statistical uncertainty of >about 100 ELO points (order of magnitude). In order to derive a safe >conclusion, you have to play that many games. I know it's a pity but >that's life. > >Regards, Uli ------------- Frist off yes I can quesion SSDF. when did I say I played a couple of games. But thats not the point. You would think with a 50+ point rating spread Fritz 5 would show more dominance in my testing. If and when it does I will say so. This is just my opinion at this time with the data I have. Remember I am not the only one who has not noticed the dominance of Fritz5. There are many games to be played and many tourneys for Fritz to play in. So with more data my mind or maybe yours will be changed. Please remember I am not attacking Fritz5. I like the program very much. I just dont think its the strongest program out.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.