Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: If you like to solve a mate...

Author: leonid

Date: 05:14:32 02/13/01

Go up one level in this thread


On February 13, 2001 at 00:16:07, Uri Blass wrote:

>On February 12, 2001 at 18:40:38, Heiner Marxen wrote:
>
>>On February 12, 2001 at 15:47:55, leonid wrote:
>>
>>>On February 12, 2001 at 13:11:53, Heiner Marxen wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 12, 2001 at 07:29:02, leonid wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>>If you like to solve a mate, try this position:
>>>>>
>>>>>[D]rQ1Q1rnk/q4qbp/3nQqbB/q1Q1NnNn/5QQ1/b2Q4/1QB3Q1/1K1R3R w - -
>>>>>
>>>>>Please, indicate your result.
>>>>>
>>>>>In dispite that this position is not that deep and difficult, if your program
>>>>>don't know how to deel with white crowd it could be in serious trouble. My was
>>>>>deadly slow in searching for mate even by selective search. Reason - white have
>>>>>142 initial moves and goes beyond 150 during the search for mate. Good challenge
>>>>>for every chess program!
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks for responding,
>>>>>Leonid.
>>>>
>>>>Hmmm, not deep?  Not difficult?  "There is no mate in 6" by Chest burns
>>>>nearly 18 minutes on a K6-3/400 with 50MB hash.  I have started depth=7,
>>>>but I expect at least 3 hours to complete it, and may be more.
>>>>At least I can confirm the 142 initial legal moves.
>>>>
>>>>Heiner
>>>
>>>Thanks, Heiner! You are very close! Mine found mate in 8 by selective. It was
>>>long. Took 1 min 17 sec.
>>>
>>>It is simple since there are not that many moves before the mate and starting
>>>move (for 8 moves) is checking one.
>>>
>>>Leonid.
>>
>>Phew, that was hard work: after 5.3 hours (K6-3/400, 50MB hash) Chest finds
>>a unique key for a mate in 7.  Here is a PV:
>>
>>Ngxf7+ Nxf7 Nxg6+ hxg6 Bxg7+ Nfxg7 Qgxh5+ Nxh5 Qfxf6+ Ngxf6 Qdxf8+ Kh7 Qgxg6#
>>
>>What about the playing programs?  Normally they are much faster to _find_
>>a mate.  Did nobody try it, or is this one also hard for them?
>>
>>Heiner
>
>My Junior5.9 found mate in 8 in a short time.
>
>Main line 1.Ngxf7+ Qaxf7 2.Bxg7+ Nfxg7(or 2...Q7xg7 3.Nxg6+ hxg6 4.Qxh5+ gxh5
>5.Rxh5+ Qfh6  6.Rxh6+ Ngxh6 7.Qxf8+ Kh7 8.Qfxg7#)  3.Qfxf6 Rxb8 4.Nfxf7+ Nxf7
>5.Qxg7+ Nxg7 6.Rxh7+ Kxh7 7.Qexg6 Kh8 8.Qh7#
>
>The part begins with 2...Q7xg7 is the main line of Junior after I give it only
>the position after 1.Ngxf7+ Qaxf7
>
>I guess that it may be possible to learn from Junior's mistakes in this line
>about the rules of the selective search that Junior is using.
>
>Junior stops to search after finising an iteration when it finds a mate for
>itself so I need to give it a position with black to move if I want it to find a
>shorter mate.
>
>Time of Junior on p200MMX 1:40

It look like Junior is very good in mate solving. Its time should be very close
to mine. My computer is quicker (400Mhz) but program use no hash. For 8 moves
hash is already very efficent.

This position also, with its whites moves hitting very often beyond 150 moves
limit, say that Junior is very solid.

Leonid.



>19496 knodes were searched.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.