Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:06:18 02/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2001 at 10:25:23, Paul Doire wrote: >On February 13, 2001 at 10:03:50, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: > >>On February 13, 2001 at 09:59:24, Paul Doire wrote: >> >>>Just look how many matches were stopped when a chessbase product was losing. >>>I had the utmost respect for the SSDF up until now, and I thought all >>>accusations were unfounded, but the proof is indisputable now...just look at >>>this page in CCC. >>> S=swedes >>> >>> S=stop >>> >>> all D=defeats >>> >>> of F=Fritz...products >>> >>>I was so much looking forward to SSDF testing CM8000 and the new Tigers, >>>but my days of naivety have now come to an end. >>> >>>Disappointed, >>>Paul >> >>Please name one single match that were stopped when a chessbase >>product was losing. >> >>I have not heard of one. >> >>Venlig hilsen >> >>Hans Christian Lykke (SSDF) > >This page would indicate that Nimzo vs Shredder has halted, or is not being >posted with the frequency of chessbase product victories. >The last page had Deep Fritz vs Crafty and a posting was made after almost every >game! >When chessbase products are losing I guess it's a big secret that SSDF would >rather not post here. I think that's a bit unfair....don't you? > >Paul I am tired of hearing this wrong claim that the ssdf stopped the match Shredder2 against Nimzo8 and I am sure that the match is going to continue. Stopping the match is against chessbase because Shredder2 has no learning function and I guess that after the match continues you are going to see Nimzo8 winning the match by repeating the same win again and again. Everybody and not only chessbase programs can do it against shredder2 so I see no propblem with it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.