Author: John Hatcher
Date: 10:20:15 02/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2001 at 12:37:52, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote: > Botvinnik-Tal,1960,game 12 > [D]8/1Q3pkp/4q2r/3p2p1/3Pr3/P5P1/3R1P1P/5RK1 b > And here Tal played 31...Re1 but 31...Reh4 > "should have won".Is that true? JAFM > Source: http://www.mark-weeks.com/chess/60tb$$.htm Tal himself suggested 31...Reh4 as the winning move in his annotations to this game. He had examined 31...Reh4 in his calculations during an earlier position in the game, and inexplicably "forgot" his analysis and played 31....Re1. He called his lapse in this position an "interesting psychological detail." John Hatcher
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.