Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 21:34:16 02/15/01
1) Can someone summarise for me what the main well known test suites are? Besides WAC that is..I used to recall a webpage that compared this and someone help? 2) Given all the complains about the uneven quality of Rating lists, what factors would you look for in deciding if a rating list is a quliaty one? Eg * Number of games * testing procedures [handling of bugs in book learning etc] * Quality of testers [Would fewer quality testers be better than lots?] * Transparancy [availability of games?, policy statements,audits? ] * Perceived indepedence * Hardware used any more? And how do the various rating lists either by organisations [SSDF], e-zines [e-bit, selective search] or single persons [eg Frank Quisinsky's list] compare acording to the citerias? It seems to me that SSDF seems to be the mostly superior in most areas, altough, they need to work on the perceived indepedence part..
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.