Author: Howard Exner
Date: 20:53:50 02/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2001 at 18:23:51, Ed Schröder wrote: >On February 16, 2001 at 16:21:29, Howard Exner wrote: > >>Thanks. Like Cadeques it's a bonus to also receive comments from strong players >>besides just game scores and results. Already the two available annotated games >>were interesting and informative. As the annotater pointed out it is not >>necessary to include in depth lines in the analysis as computers do this >>already. Rather, comments on plans and piece placement is adequate. >> >>It is also refreshing to read that the annotator admits to the complexity of the >>positions. Often chess writers explain things in too rigid a manner, as if there >>was only one plan of action in a game. > >Glad Kenneths comments are received well, I will tell him. A 3th analyzed >game of round-1 just came in, together with a welcome word of the president >of the "Baltijos Lyga" chess club who has mobilized his staff, IM's and GM's >to support this tournament. The contacts you made during the GM challenge are paying off! >The 3th game + the welcome word will be on my >server tomorrow. > >Keep an eye on this page, these guys are moving extremely fast contributing >all kind things, BIO's, annotated games, round reports with expressions and >I can not put every new change or update in the news section. > >Lots of work but then it is an interesting tournament. > >Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.