Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:46:20 02/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2001 at 01:45:25, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On February 16, 2001 at 23:37:30, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I am interested to know what was the mistakes of Deep Fritz based on the >>analysis and if Deep Fritz could avoid the mistake at fair conditions 23 hours >>per move(The Web could use Deep Fritz for 23 hours per move to consider their >>move and giving Deep Fritz only one hour was clearly unfair). >> >>I did not follow the discussion about the match because I do not understand >>German. >> >>I am also interested to know Deep Fritz evaluations. >> >>Does somebody have the game with Deep Fritz evaluations? >> >>Uri > >Hi! > >(sory, but I can You not help) > >Here only my opinion to this game: > >I played this game, from Dec. 2000 to today! But "now" (today) I'm resign. :) >Germany played very strong, from the move 28 to move 65. DF give the best, but >the game is now anyway theoretical win for Germany! > >The move 27.Re1 was a bad book-move (Rg1! is better). The "win move" from >Germany was 28...d5! (it was a new theoretical move). > >But after 65.Kd3 played Germany 65...Rb3!? I'm sure that this move nobody >1700 >Elo played (I'm sorry). Light win moves 65...Kb5! or 65...Ra2. I also prefer these moves but I think that >1700 players may play Rb3 because they may believe that everything that is not a sacrifice wins in this position. > >Therefore I belive, that now this game end draw. :) I guess that you are joking and it is a win for black but I did not analyze the game to prove that black can win. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.