Author: Hans Christian Lykke
Date: 07:25:29 02/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2001 at 08:09:53, Aaron Tay wrote: >On February 16, 2001 at 09:31:12, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: > >>On February 16, 2001 at 00:34:16, Aaron Tay wrote: >>>2) Given all the complains about the uneven quality of Rating lists, what >>>factors would you look for in deciding if a rating list is a quliaty one? >>> >>>Eg >>> >>>* Number of games >>>* testing procedures [handling of bugs in book learning etc] >>>* Quality of testers [Would fewer quality testers be better than lots?] >>>* Transparancy [availability of games?, policy statements,audits? ] >>>* Perceived indepedence >>>* Hardware used >>> >>> >>>any more? And how do the various rating lists either by organisations [SSDF], >>>e-zines [e-bit, selective search] or single persons [eg Frank Quisinsky's list] compare acording to the citerias? > >>>It seems to me that SSDF seems to be the mostly superior in most areas, altough,they need to work on the perceived indepedence part.. > >>I think that SSDF can not be more independent than we are. >>Complete independent. >> >>Venlig hilsen >>Hans Christian Lykke (SSDF) > >That's worthless if people [some anyway] don't PERCEIVE that you are >independent. When I am right about something, I normally don´t care a lot what other people says. If you ask people how far it is from USA to Russia, and give them the choices: about 70 km, about 700 km, and about 7000 km, I think the most people will give the wrong answer. But I don´t care a lot! Venlig hilsen Hans Cristian Lykke (SSDF) http://home3.inet.tele.dk/hclykke/
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.