Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CM8000 - patch cosmetics

Author: Thomas Lagershausen

Date: 08:01:14 02/17/01

Go up one level in this thread


On February 17, 2001 at 09:57:48, William Penn wrote:

>CM8000 - patch cosmetics
>
>My problems with the patch were substantially fixed by reinstalling CM8000 with
>the Typical option.  So it's now down to cosmetics...

I also think that the CM 8000 is one of the big inovative chess-GUI´s.So it is
normal that our thoughts are by some improvements.
>
>Help (F1) Contents:
>There are minor formatting glitches in some of the subdialog boxes. For example
>under Defining Your Room Environment, Designing Your Playing Area Layout,
>clicking some of the green links shows an extra row of tabbed numbers at the
>left.
>
>Visual Thinking:
>needs a move indicator, white or black to move from the given position.  That
>little chessboard diagram has a really excellent design, very legible, so please
>don't change it!?  Except in a perfect world I would make it about 25% larger.

I absolutly agree.Great looking but a little bit larger would be fine for our
eyes.But one extra wish: When i load in the gameoption a second engine as for
example white CM and black Gandalf.The visual thinking should now show the
gandalfvariation by clicking the black button.At the moment it shows allways the
CM-variation.Is this only on my computer?
>
>Chess Sets:
>Most of them have poor legibility.  I wish that exactly the same chessboard &
>pieces as used in the Visual Thinking window were available as an option here,
>in a larger size(s) of course.

Yes, at the moment only the customerboard has this standardlook of chessboards.
>
>Thinking Lines:
>Leave out the unnecessary spaces between the move number and the move. For
>example rather than 33... Rf8 34. Nd2 Nf6 35. Ng3 Rxf7 it should be 33...Rf8
>34.Nd2 Nf6 35.Ng3 Rxf7.  Also the g's descender is cut off in the bottom line in
>the Current Move(s) column, so needs about 1/4th-of-a-line more vertical space.
>
>On a scale of 1 to 10 (1=bad 10=good), I would rate:
>CM7000 = 1 or 2
>the original CM8000 release = 2 or 3
>after the 101 patch = 6 or 7
>So it's getting significantly better, but Pawlak's review is correct -- there's
>still room for improvement.
>
>WP
I like the CM 8000 very much.The engine is so interesting and together with
Gandalf it´s great to analyze my games with both chessprogrames.A great team
with a lot of idears for creative chess.

Thomas Lagershausen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.