Author: Lonnie Cook
Date: 20:06:30 02/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2001 at 17:13:02, Ed Schröder wrote: >On February 17, 2001 at 14:52:14, Garry Evans wrote: > >>What a Shame!, I thought shredder was stronger than that. Although in all >>fairness to shredder Dreev is a 2675 elo player. > > >Using Century 3 I noticed 2 important differences > >[d]3r2k1/1b1nqppp/2pb1n2/1p2p3/rP1PP3/3B1NN1/2QB1PPP/1R3RK1 b - - > >18. Ne2-g3 e5xd4 * > Shredder :12.00 0.18 exd4 Nf5 Qf8 N3xd4 Bxb4 Bxb4 Rxb4 Nxc6 Bxc6 > CENTURY 3.0 :12.00 0.43 g6 Nxe5 Nxe5 dxe5 Bxe5 Bc3 h5 Bxe5 Qxe5 Rfd1 h4 > >18... g6 prevents the dangerous 19.Nf5 but weakens the black king-pawn shelter. >I wonder if 18...g6 is wrong too. Too difficult for me to judge. Still allowing >19.Nf5 looks as the start for black problems. > > >[d]3r1qk1/1b1n1ppp/2pb1n2/1p3NB1/rP1pP3/3B1N2/2Q2PPP/1R3RK1 b - - > > 19. Ng3-f5 Qe7-f8 > 20. Bd2-g5 Ra4xb4 * > Shredder :12.00 -0.48 Rxb4 Rxb4 Bxb4 e5 Qc5 exf6 Qxc2 Bxc2 gxf6 Bh6 > CENTURY 3.!!:12.00 0.30 Rda8 Bxf6 gxf6 N3xd4 Ne5 f4 Ra2 Qd1 Nxd3 Nxd6 > >I don't understand 20...Rxb4, look at the score difference of 0.78. But maybe >in this stage it already makes no sense anymore. Hard to say. > >Analyze level was 3 minutes average, PIII-800, using Analyze Game. > >What do other programs say? > >Ed > >PS, is it just me or is CCC slow since the last weeks? utterly, hideously slow, it really shows logging on
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.