Author: Will Singleton
Date: 22:30:48 03/06/98
Go up one level in this thread
On March 06, 1998 at 20:40:42, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >first thing to look at is 32 bits is not enough. you will get way too >many false matches (collisions).. enough to produce bogus results. > I see from Nelson's icca article that you had been using 40 bits, and he intimated that it should or would be expanded to 64. I assume that was due to memory limits. Is there a correlation between hashkey and index size? That is, if I go to 40 or 64 bits, is the optimum overall table size affected? > >I didn't see an example of what kind of problem you are having... > My results are unpredictable, something is causing wrong move selection. I posted the logic and the pseudo-code in the hope that perhaps someone could see a flaw in my understanding of the process. Since the process seems clear enough, however, I guess it's just a question of some creative time with the debugger :-< Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.