Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:22:31 02/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2001 at 16:56:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 20, 2001 at 15:54:42, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>[Event "ipccc-2001"] >>[Site "Paderborn"] >>[Date "2001.02.20"] >>[Round "1"] >>[White "Comet-B.31"] >>[Black "Holmes"] >>[Result "1/2-1/2"] >> >>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 Nxc3 6. bxc3 Bg7 7. Bc4 c5 8. >>Ne2 Nc6 9. Be3 O-O 10. Rc1 cxd4 11. cxd4 Qa5+ 12. Kf1 Bd7 13. h4 Rac8 14. h5 e5 >>15. hxg6 hxg6 16. d5 Nd4 17. Nxd4 exd4 18. Bd2 Qb6 19. Rb1 Ba4 20. Qe1 Qf6 21. >>Qe2 Rc7 22. Rb4 Bc2 23. Be1 a5 24. Rb5 Bxe4 25. Qxe4 Rxc4 26. Rh3 Rc1 27. Rb2 >>Qa6+ 28. Re2 Rd8 29. Kg1 Rc5 30. Bd2 Rxd5 31. Qe7 Bf6 32. Qe8+ Rxe8 33. Rxe8+ >>Kg7 34. Bh6+ Kh7 35. Bg5+ 1/2-1/2 >> >>On move 30. ... Rxd5 >>which rook? > >Rcxd5 > >It is easy to find out because after 30...Rdxd5 31.Qe7??(Qe8+ is a simple forced >mate) Bf6?? 32.Qe8+ the move 32...Rxe8 is illegal. > >Uri Yeah, but who produces PGN where you have to use retrograde analysis to figure out which move was actually made? :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.