Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:47:49 02/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2001 at 20:07:49, Christophe Theron wrote:
>On February 21, 2001 at 17:19:34, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On February 21, 2001 at 14:35:52, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>>
>>>Shredder - Nimzo 1/2-1/2
>>>ZChess - Gromit 0-1
>>>P.ConNerS - Fritz 0-1
>>>Gandalf - Diep 1-0
>>>SOS - YACE 1/2-1/2
>>>Patzer - Ikarus 0-1
>>>Comet - Quark 1-0
>>>Isichess - Holmes 1-0
>>>Matador - Neurologic 1-0
>>>
>>
>>With Deep Shredder and Deep SOS out of its way Nimzo 8 only have a real tough
>>Opponent left Deep Fritz, But since Nimzo 8 behave differently when using a
>>Processor higher than 800 MHz and it was proven in the Cadaque's Tourney and >>in my private testing of several games using my AMD Athlon 800 MHz Deep Fritz
>>will not have an easy match against Nimzo 8, especially if the Middlegame
>>Mobility is set up Between 48 to 58.
>>
>>Pichard
Nothing like that has been ever proved, except in your imagination.
Christophe
I Just ordered Rebel Tiger 13.0 and as soon as I receive your patch with
Gambit 2.0 with the broken learner fixed, I will start a 200 games match at
G\60 against Nimzo 8. Since this is the only way to satisfy your statistical
mind. I noticed that anything less than 200 games match is not a sound
statistical proof per your standard.
Pichard
>>>Standings:
>>>
>>>Shredder 2.5
>>>Nimzo 2.5
>>>Gromit 2.5
>>>Zchess 2
>>>Fritz 2
>>>Ikarus 2
>>>Gandalf 2
>>>P.Conners 1.5
>>>SOS 1.5
>>>Yace 1.5
>>>Comet 1.5
>>>Diep 1
>>>Patzer 1
>>>Quark 1
>>>Isichess 1
>>>Matador 1
>>>Holmes 0.5
>>>Neurologic 0
>>>
>>>Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.